-
![R v. HM Coroner for Manchester City [2026] EWHC 810](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0637.jpg?w=695)
R v. HM Coroner for Manchester City [2026] EWHC 810
Read more: R v. HM Coroner for Manchester City [2026] EWHC 810In a claim for judicial review, the Coroner ‘…did not err in leaving out of account the neurological evidence of an appropriate treatment plan…’ but ‘contextualised the evidence and brought an appropriate focus to bear on the key issues that most clearly, on the evidence, might have contributed to… death’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/admin/2026/810
-
![The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0637.jpg?w=695)
The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47
Read more: The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47Where evidence was subject to a Public Interest Immunity certificate, ‘the assessment of the Minister and of the Secretary of State regarding the nature and extent of damage to national security should have been accepted by the Coroner unless there was no evidence to support that assessment or the assessment was Wednesbury irrational’ and prior…
-
![Ferguson, R v. HM Assistant Coroner [2025] EWHC 1901](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0637.jpg?w=695)
Ferguson, R v. HM Assistant Coroner [2025] EWHC 1901
Read more: Ferguson, R v. HM Assistant Coroner [2025] EWHC 1901On judicial review the Coroner’s decisions that (i) the enhanced investigative duty under Article 2 ECHR was not engaged, and (ii) the inquest would be heard without a jury, were quashed where ‘the evidence, primarily in the Chief Constable’s own PSD report, revealed a series of acts or omissions by the officers which could have…