-
![GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0635.jpg?w=817)
GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53
Read more: GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53Where ‘a judge has identified that there were factors which the MPT wrongly left out of account when they decided that suspension was a sufficient sanction’ it is not ‘incumbent upon him to explain why those factors did not move the appropriate sanction across the threshold from suspension to erasure’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/53
-
![Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/img_0655.jpg?w=903)
Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2
Read more: Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2The Supreme Court confirms that a claimant found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity should be barred from claiming compensation for the consequences of his unlawful killings, and from being indemnified in respect of his civil liability to his victims, by the defence of illegality – ‘the availability of the plea of illegality…
-
![The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0637.jpg?w=695)
The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47
Read more: The Thompson Inquest [2025] UKSC 47Where evidence was subject to a Public Interest Immunity certificate, ‘the assessment of the Minister and of the Secretary of State regarding the nature and extent of damage to national security should have been accepted by the Coroner unless there was no evidence to support that assessment or the assessment was Wednesbury irrational’ and prior…