-
![Suresh & Ors v. GMC [2026] EWCA Civ 955](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0635.jpg?w=817)
Suresh & Ors v. GMC [2026] EWCA Civ 955
Read more: Suresh & Ors v. GMC [2026] EWCA Civ 955In a case of suicide following notification of investigation into a doctors fitness to practice, it is considered that Robinson [2018] UKSC 4 did not involve ‘reconsideration of the principle that the police and prosecutors do not owe a duty of care to suspects, witnesses or victims in the investigation and prosecution of crime, or…
-
![Bhatti v. Darlington NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1079 (KB)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/img_0655.jpg?w=903)
Bhatti v. Darlington NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1079 (KB)
Read more: Bhatti v. Darlington NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1079 (KB)No injunctive relief where a surgeon’s practice is restricted to non-clinical/administrative work, even though ‘there are strong grounds to submit that the effect…. on the Claimant was tantamount to an exclusion’ where the Trust’s decision was ‘founded on patient safety and probity considerations that are, and remain, of fundamental importance…’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2026/1079
-
![GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0635.jpg?w=817)
GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53
Read more: GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53Where ‘a judge has identified that there were factors which the MPT wrongly left out of account when they decided that suspension was a sufficient sanction’ it is not ‘incumbent upon him to explain why those factors did not move the appropriate sanction across the threshold from suspension to erasure’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/53