-
![Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)
Read more: Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)Successful application under s.2 Forfeiture Act 1982 for relief from all the effects of the forfeiture rule, in a case of assisted suicide at a clinic in Switzerland: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2554
-
![Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)
Read more: Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)Despite being acquitted of murder, ‘…the forfeiture rule precludes him from acquiring any benefit under… [her] will, her intestacy or any property formerly held by her under a joint tenancy’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2277
-
![Dunstan v. Ball [2024] EWHC 2105 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Dunstan v. Ball [2024] EWHC 2105 (Ch)
Read more: Dunstan v. Ball [2024] EWHC 2105 (Ch)Claims of undue influence, fraudulent calumny and want of knowledge are dismissed in a case where detailed attendance notes were ‘created by an employee of a reputable firm of solicitors against whom no allegations of fraud or mis-recording has been made’, despite the Will excluding one of two daughters: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2105
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Charles Cooper | Barrister & Mediator 