-
![Archibald (Dec’d) & Anor v. Stuart [2023] EWHC 2515 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Archibald (Dec’d) & Anor v. Stuart [2023] EWHC 2515 (Ch)
Read more: Archibald (Dec’d) & Anor v. Stuart [2023] EWHC 2515 (Ch)A claim by a child under the 1975 Act does not survive his or her death, and a usual relationship between parents and daughter/son-in-law does not give standing to the surviving spouse to bring a claim under s.1(1)(d) of the Act: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2515
-
![Vasami & Anor v. Hack [2023] EWHC 2431 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Vasami & Anor v. Hack [2023] EWHC 2431 (Ch)
Read more: Vasami & Anor v. Hack [2023] EWHC 2431 (Ch)No detrimental reliance and no proprietary estoppel where ‘paid a wage, had free occupation of the farmhouse… with bills paid, and could and did undertake other paid employment’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2431
-
![Winter & Anor v. Winter [2023] EWHC 2393 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Winter & Anor v. Winter [2023] EWHC 2393 (Ch)
Read more: Winter & Anor v. Winter [2023] EWHC 2393 (Ch)The benefit of a share in the partnership and shares in the family company worth £2million does not outweigh the detriment of ‘working very hard for most of their working lives for little reward in terms of pay’ in a claim for proprietary estoppel: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2393