-
![Ramji v. Harvey & Ors [2023] EWHC 1664 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Ramji v. Harvey & Ors [2023] EWHC 1664 (Ch)
Read more: Ramji v. Harvey & Ors [2023] EWHC 1664 (Ch)Undue influence by wife resulting in lifetime transfer of property being set aside, and no constructive trust over second property described as “our house” or “our family house”: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/1664
-
![Jones & Ors v. Jones [2023] EWHC 1457 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Jones & Ors v. Jones [2023] EWHC 1457 (Ch)
Read more: Jones & Ors v. Jones [2023] EWHC 1457 (Ch)Undue influence where 82 year old testatrix, ‘devastated by her daughter’s death’ and suffering from dementia, was ‘increasingly isolated… from other members of the family’ by the Defendant, the will prepared by a Chartered Accountant ‘without a further medical examination’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/1457
-
![Sangha v. Sangha & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 660](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Sangha v. Sangha & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 660
Read more: Sangha v. Sangha & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 660The presumption against intestacy is ‘not… enough to overcome the natural meaning of the general revocation clause’ in the Will: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/660