-
![Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)
Read more: Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)A child who fails a paternity test still falls within a class of beneficiaries which includes ‘children and remoter issue of’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2086
-
![Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303
Read more: Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303In the absence of a charging clause for professional trustees, entitlement to reasonable remuneration under s.29 Trustee Act 2000 relies on the agreement in writing of each trustee including those executors to whom power was reserved: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/303
-
![Savage v. Savage [2024] EWCA Civ 49](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Savage v. Savage [2024] EWCA Civ 49
Read more: Savage v. Savage [2024] EWCA Civ 49‘Section 15(3) [TOLATA 1996] does not expressly, or by implication, exclude the circumstances and wishes of the minority of beneficiaries by value from being taken into account by the court. It simply does not include these matters in the list of matters that must be considered’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/49