-
![Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303
Read more: Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303In the absence of a charging clause for professional trustees, entitlement to reasonable remuneration under s.29 Trustee Act 2000 relies on the agreement in writing of each trustee including those executors to whom power was reserved: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/303
-
![NatWest & Ors v. Ludlow Trust Co [2023] EWHC 2532 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
NatWest & Ors v. Ludlow Trust Co [2023] EWHC 2532 (Ch)
Read more: NatWest & Ors v. Ludlow Trust Co [2023] EWHC 2532 (Ch)The Court is willing to exercise its power to appoint new trustees under s.41(1) Trustee Act 1925 where the current trustees have divested themselves of their trust administration business, ‘extensive attempts’ have been made to contact those with powers of appointment of new trustees, and there is no objection to the application: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2532
-
![Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/supreme-court2a.jpg?w=811)
Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47
Read more: Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47The purpose of the trust itself is of central importance to determining whether the use of a power to amend, even if within the scope of the express or implied terms, was for an ‘improper purpose’ i.e. a purpose other than those for which the power was conferred: https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2020-0064-0065-judgment.pdf