-
![Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)
Read more: Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)Trustees are entitled to defend an application to remove them, and such an application is capable of being dismissed ‘in the face of hostility, at least coming from a beneficiary, where the trustees are suitable and willing to administer the trusts in the interests of all the beneficiaries’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/1099
-
![Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/supreme-court2a.jpg?w=811)
Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10
Read more: Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10The Supreme Court holds that, when considering profits made by a trustee/fiduciary, the question is ‘did the profit owe its existence to a significant extent to the application by the fiduciary of property, information or some other advantage which he enjoyed as a result of his fiduciary position, or from some activity undertaken while he…
-
![Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303
Read more: Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303In the absence of a charging clause for professional trustees, entitlement to reasonable remuneration under s.29 Trustee Act 2000 relies on the agreement in writing of each trustee including those executors to whom power was reserved: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/303