-
![Wilkinson v. Kirkham [2026] EWHC 1006 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Wilkinson v. Kirkham [2026] EWHC 1006 (Ch)
Read more: Wilkinson v. Kirkham [2026] EWHC 1006 (Ch)A gift of residue “to the daughter of” is not void for uncertainty where there is more than one daughter – ‘the expression “the daughter” refers to the daughters, who take under clause 4 of the will in equal shares’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/1006
-
![Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)
Read more: Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)On the true construction of the Will the Trust Fund should be divided into three equal shares, and it is not necessary to rectify the Will so as to replace the word ‘four’ with the word ‘three’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/28
-
![Dryden v. Young & Ors [2024] EWHC 1095 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Dryden v. Young & Ors [2024] EWHC 1095 (Ch)
Read more: Dryden v. Young & Ors [2024] EWHC 1095 (Ch)Gifts to seven charities within a Will with incorrect names, incorrect addresses, or incorrect names and addresses, are all declared valid gifts: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/1095