-
![Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)
Read more: Bonham v. Stringer & Ors [2025] EWHC 28 (Ch)On the true construction of the Will the Trust Fund should be divided into three equal shares, and it is not necessary to rectify the Will so as to replace the word ‘four’ with the word ‘three’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/28
-
![Crew v. Oakley & Ors [2024] EWHC 2847 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Crew v. Oakley & Ors [2024] EWHC 2847 (Ch)
Read more: Crew v. Oakley & Ors [2024] EWHC 2847 (Ch)In a case of revocation by destruction, the Court prefers evidence as to capacity from ‘a conscientious professional solicitor’ who knew the testatrix well and kept detailed contemporaneous attendance notes: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2847
-
![Bond & Anor v. Webster [2024] EWHC 1972 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Bond & Anor v. Webster [2024] EWHC 1972 (Ch)
Read more: Bond & Anor v. Webster [2024] EWHC 1972 (Ch)No testamentary capacity where a non-Solicitor ‘private client practitioner’ failed to record any formal assessment of capacity for a wheelchair-bound testator with brain cancer, failed to request a proper assessment from the testator’s treating physician, and failed to record any reasons for departing from the previous Will or as to why the testator was not…