-
![Townsend v. Epsom NHS Trust [2026] EWCA Civ 195](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0638.jpg?w=860)
Townsend v. Epsom NHS Trust [2026] EWCA Civ 195
Read more: Townsend v. Epsom NHS Trust [2026] EWCA Civ 195‘Any decision about the care and treatment of a mentally incapacitated adult, including the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, must be taken in the patient’s best interests… If there is disagreement, “a court application can and should be made”… The hospital cannot pre-empt court proceedings by unilaterally withholding or withdrawing treatment on “clinical” grounds’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/195
-
![GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/img_0635.jpg?w=817)
GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53
Read more: GMC v. Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53Where ‘a judge has identified that there were factors which the MPT wrongly left out of account when they decided that suspension was a sufficient sanction’ it is not ‘incumbent upon him to explain why those factors did not move the appropriate sanction across the threshold from suspension to erasure’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/53
-
![Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/img_0655.jpg?w=903)
Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2
Read more: Lewis-Ranwell v. G4S Health Services & Ors [2026] UKSC 2The Supreme Court confirms that a claimant found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity should be barred from claiming compensation for the consequences of his unlawful killings, and from being indemnified in respect of his civil liability to his victims, by the defence of illegality – ‘the availability of the plea of illegality…