-
![Grijns v. Grijns [2025] EWHC 2853 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Grijns v. Grijns [2025] EWHC 2853 (Ch)
Read more: Grijns v. Grijns [2025] EWHC 2853 (Ch)In a proprietary estoppel case where the successful party was ‘said to have been unreasonable in their approach to mediation’, the Court finds ‘There can be no quarrel with the idea that parties, in litigation, should make reasonable efforts to settle… That, however, does not compel, or require, a litigant, confronted by a wholly unreasonable…
-
![Fernandez v. Fernandez [2025] EWHC 2373 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Fernandez v. Fernandez [2025] EWHC 2373 (Ch)
Read more: Fernandez v. Fernandez [2025] EWHC 2373 (Ch)When deciding to remove an executor under s.50 AJA 1985 the test is not whether ‘continuation in office would impede the due administration of the estate or cause harm to the beneficiaries’, nor whether the ‘estate was endangered’, and the Court was entitled to take into account various conflicts of interest and ‘that personal hostility…
-
![Rogers v. Wills [2025] EWHC 1367 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Rogers v. Wills [2025] EWHC 1367 (Ch)
Read more: Rogers v. Wills [2025] EWHC 1367 (Ch)An estate is liable for the value of care provided by a daughter either under contract or on the basis of unjust enrichment, where the deceased ‘accepted those benefits, having the opportunity to decline them, and knowing that they were expected to be paid for (free acceptance)’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/1367