-
![Osborne & Anor v. Osborne [2025] EWHC 455 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Osborne & Anor v. Osborne [2025] EWHC 455 (Ch)
Read more: Osborne & Anor v. Osborne [2025] EWHC 455 (Ch)A residuary beneficiary is removed as executor where the Court had ‘not found that he was guilty of any wrongdoing and, in particular, that he has consciously preferred his own interests to the interests of the estate… [but] that the Letter of Wishes and the Defendant’s reliance on it give rise to a conflict’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/455
-
![Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)
Read more: Morris v. Morris & Ors [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch)Successful application under s.2 Forfeiture Act 1982 for relief from all the effects of the forfeiture rule, in a case of assisted suicide at a clinic in Switzerland: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2554
-
![Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)
Read more: Leeson & Anor v. McPherson [2024] EWHC 2277 (Ch)Despite being acquitted of murder, ‘…the forfeiture rule precludes him from acquiring any benefit under… [her] will, her intestacy or any property formerly held by her under a joint tenancy’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2277