-
![Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)
Read more: Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)An executor loses indemnity for costs in fighting his removal ‘when it ought to have been obvious that… in light of the allegations made against him, the administration of the estate would not be carried out effectively and properly so long as he remained’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2964
-
![King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)
Read more: King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)‘Special circumstances make it necessary and expedient to pass over the claims of both [sons to administer the estate]… and to appoint an independent professional pursuant to s.116 Senior Courts Act 1981’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/2822
-
Richefond & Ors v. Dillon [2023] EWHC 2796 (Ch)
Read more: Richefond & Ors v. Dillon [2023] EWHC 2796 (Ch)Executors to pay their own legal costs in a claim to propound a Will where they had ‘knowledge of the potential uncertainties’ and ‘the circumstances were such as to reasonably lead to an investigation’, but they failed to investigate prior to issuing proceedings, and failed to take a neutral stance: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2796
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Charles Cooper | Barrister 