-
![Kenig v. Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Kenig v. Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15
Read more: Kenig v. Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15It is open to a beneficiary to challenge legal fees, even though already paid from estate funds, under s.71(3) Solicitors Act 1974, but ‘fully informed consent by the executor (if proved) is likely to be a major consideration, which in many cases may prove to be determinative’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/15
-
![Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)
Read more: Stoney-Anderson v. Abbas [2023] EWHC 2964 (Ch)An executor loses indemnity for costs in fighting his removal ‘when it ought to have been obvious that… in light of the allegations made against him, the administration of the estate would not be carried out effectively and properly so long as he remained’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/2964
-
![King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj3.jpg?w=714)
King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)
Read more: King v. King [2023] EWHC 2822 (Fam)‘Special circumstances make it necessary and expedient to pass over the claims of both [sons to administer the estate]… and to appoint an independent professional pursuant to s.116 Senior Courts Act 1981’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/2822