-
![Beresford (Dec’d) v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 952 (TC)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/hmrc.png?w=534)
Beresford (Dec’d) v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 952 (TC)
Read more: Beresford (Dec’d) v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 952 (TC)The frequency of transactions for serviced office lets were ‘clearly not analogous to a hotel business’ and the business amounted to ‘wholly or mainly making or holding of investments’ for Inheritance Tax Business Property Relief: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/tc/2024/952
-
![Demetriou & Anor v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 830 (TC)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ftt-taylor-house-london-1.jpg?w=779)
Demetriou & Anor v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 830 (TC)
Read more: Demetriou & Anor v. HMRC [2024] UKFTT 830 (TC)A managed chalk stream trout fishery ‘was mainly a business of holding investments’ and does not benefit from Inheritance Tax Business Property Relief under s.104 ITA 1984: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/tc/2024/830
-
![Butler & Ors v. HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00872 (TC)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ftt-taylor-house-london-1.jpg?w=779)
Butler & Ors v. HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00872 (TC)
Read more: Butler & Ors v. HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00872 (TC)Where catering is provided by a separate business, a wedding venue is ‘predominantly for the purpose of holding its property as an investment’ and Business Property Relief does not apply for Inheritance Tax purposes: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/tc/2023/872