-
![Shah [2023] UKFTT 00539 (TC)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ftt-taylor-house-london-1.jpg?w=779)
Shah [2023] UKFTT 00539 (TC)
Read more: Shah [2023] UKFTT 00539 (TC)Domicile of choice in England acquired and not abandoned after gaining British citizenship, settling in England, and ‘retaining limited connections with modern India’, even though the Wills declared a domicile in India, only £680k of the £2.48M estate was situated in the UK, and the deceased had expressed an intention to leave the UK: https://financeandtax.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk//judgmentfiles/j12757/TC%2008842.pdf
-
![Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534
Read more: Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534No mistake where ‘deliberately chose to implement what they knew to be a tax avoidance scheme [with] … a risk of failure’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/534
-
![Pride [2023] UKFTT 00316 (TC)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ftt-taylor-house-london-1.jpg?w=779)
Pride [2023] UKFTT 00316 (TC)
Read more: Pride [2023] UKFTT 00316 (TC)A ‘loan note’ Inheritance Tax planning scheme which has failed at first instance: https://financeandtax.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk/judgmentfiles/j12698/TC%2008776.pdf