-
![Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/supreme-court2a.jpg?w=811)
Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10
Read more: Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10The Supreme Court holds that, when considering profits made by a trustee/fiduciary, the question is ‘did the profit owe its existence to a significant extent to the application by the fiduciary of property, information or some other advantage which he enjoyed as a result of his fiduciary position, or from some activity undertaken while he…
-
![Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)
Read more: Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)A child who fails a paternity test still falls within a class of beneficiaries which includes ‘children and remoter issue of’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2086
-
![Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303
Read more: Brealey v. Shepherd & Co [2024] EWCA Civ 303In the absence of a charging clause for professional trustees, entitlement to reasonable remuneration under s.29 Trustee Act 2000 relies on the agreement in writing of each trustee including those executors to whom power was reserved: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/303