-
![Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)
Read more: Earl of Yarmouth v. Ragley Trust Co & Ors [2025] EWHC 1099 (Ch)Trustees are entitled to defend an application to remove them, and such an application is capable of being dismissed ‘in the face of hostility, at least coming from a beneficiary, where the trustees are suitable and willing to administer the trusts in the interests of all the beneficiaries’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/1099
-
![Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/supreme-court2a.jpg?w=811)
Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10
Read more: Rukhadze v. Recovery Partners [2025] UKSC 10The Supreme Court holds that, when considering profits made by a trustee/fiduciary, the question is ‘did the profit owe its existence to a significant extent to the application by the fiduciary of property, information or some other advantage which he enjoyed as a result of his fiduciary position, or from some activity undertaken while he…
-
![Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ut-rolls-building.jpg?w=907)
Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)
Read more: Marcus v. Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)A child who fails a paternity test still falls within a class of beneficiaries which includes ‘children and remoter issue of’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2024/2086