-
![Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/rcj2.jpg?w=946)
Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534
Read more: Bhaur v. Equity First Trustees [2023] EWCA Civ 534No mistake where ‘deliberately chose to implement what they knew to be a tax avoidance scheme [with] … a risk of failure’: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/534
-
![Alizade & Ors v. Kublick [2023] EWHC 1082 (Ch)](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/rcj4.jpg?w=822)
Alizade & Ors v. Kublick [2023] EWHC 1082 (Ch)
Read more: Alizade & Ors v. Kublick [2023] EWHC 1082 (Ch)‘Oppressive’ and ‘burdensome’ claims for an account of the administration of two estates and will trusts from an 89 year old trustee are dismissed: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2023/1082
-
![Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47](https://trustsbarrister.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/supreme-court2a.jpg?w=811)
Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47
Read more: Grand View v. Wong [2022] UKPC 47The purpose of the trust itself is of central importance to determining whether the use of a power to amend, even if within the scope of the express or implied terms, was for an ‘improper purpose’ i.e. a purpose other than those for which the power was conferred: https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2020-0064-0065-judgment.pdf